Nudge Patterns

Marketing & Brand Psychology

Marketing has always used psychological effects, often with great confidence. How strongly social proof, scarcity or loss aversion work in practice is less clear than advice books suggest.

We sort these tactics by their evidence, show borderline cases and name where advertising tips into the misleading, for example with artificial countdown timers.

How to read the scores

Guides in this area

  • Social proof: what audience claims support and what they do not

    Descriptive and injunctive norms, the boomerang effect, and the question of how specific an audience claim should be.

    Descriptive norm
    Effect
    Context-dependent
    Transfer
    Partially supported
    Specific reference group
    Effect
    Preliminary
    Transfer
    Plausible
    Injunctive norm against the boomerang
    Effect
    Weak
    Transfer
    Plausible
  • Scarcity and urgency: genuine and artificial

    Quantity scarcity, time scarcity and the line to deception: what research supports about scarcity and what countdown timers do.

    Quantity scarcity
    Effect
    Context-dependent
    Transfer
    Plausible
    Time scarcity
    Effect
    Context-dependent
    Transfer
    Plausible
    Scarcity caused by others’ demand
    Effect
    Weak
    Transfer
    Plausible
  • Authority, trust badges and expert quotes: what is supported

    Milgram supports obedience, not trust badges. What source credibility delivers and why trust signals are a usability matter.

    Obedience to authority
    Effect
    Robust
    Transfer
    Hypothesis
    Source credibility
    Effect
    Context-dependent
    Transfer
    Plausible
    Trust badges at checkout
    Effect
    Preliminary
    Transfer
    Hypothesis
  • Loss aversion in copy: an effect whose strength is debated

    Do losses weigh twice as much? What prospect theory supports, what has been contested since 2018, and what remains for ad copy.

    Loss aversion in decisions
    Effect
    Robust
    Transfer
    Plausible
    Loss framing in copy
    Effect
    Weak
    Transfer
    Plausible
    Endowment effect and free trials
    Effect
    Weak
    Transfer
    Plausible
  • Tone of address: what research on formal and informal gives us

    Self-referencing, pronouns in service contacts and the formal/informal question: where the research holds and where it is simply missing.

    Self-referencing through direct address
    Effect
    Weak
    Transfer
    Hypothesis
    Pronouns in service contacts
    Effect
    Context-dependent
    Transfer
    Partially supported
    Informal instead of formal address
    Effect
    Preliminary
    Transfer
    Hypothesis

Pattern map

1122334455TransferEffect123456789101112131415

Patterns on the map

  1. Obedience to authority
  2. Loss aversion in decisions
  3. Quantity scarcity
  4. Time scarcity
  5. Source credibility
  6. Descriptive norm
  7. Pronouns in service contacts
  8. Self-referencing through direct address
  9. Injunctive norm against the boomerang
  10. Scarcity caused by others’ demand
  11. Loss framing in copy
  12. Endowment effect and free trials
  13. Trust badges at checkout
  14. Informal instead of formal address
  15. Specific reference group

Shaded: area of high evidence level